<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>64-bit &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://wordpress.com/tag/64-bit/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "64-bit"</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 03:10:28 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Java support and latest Flash for Konqueror on Amd64]]></title>
<link>http://sidrit.wordpress.com/?p=228</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Sidrit Trandafili</dc:creator>
<guid>http://sidrit.pl.wordpress.com/2008/10/10/java-support-and-latest-flash-for-konqueror-on-amd64/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A few days ago i installed Konqueror on a Ubuntu 64bit machine, upon request.

The installation went]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few days ago i installed Konqueror on a Ubuntu 64bit machine, upon request.<br />
<iframe src='http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fdigg.com%2Flinux_unix%2FJava_support_and_latest_Flash_for_Konqueror_on_Amd64' height='82' width='55' frameborder='0' scrolling='no' style='float: right; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 5px; padding: 4px 0 2px 4px; background: #fff;'></iframe><br />
The installation went smooth (why not?). The issue came up while attempting to get Flash and Java to work.<br />
The workaround was fairly simple.</p>
<p><strong>Java</strong><br />
After installing Java, the trick is done by giving Konqueror the absolute path of the executable:</p>
<p><em>Konqueror -&#62; Settings -&#62;Configure Konqueror -&#62; Java &#38; Javascript </em></p>
<p>and set (in my case) to <em>/usr/bin/java</em></p>
<p><strong>Flash</strong></p>
<p>Open a shell window and type:<br />
<code>sudo apt-get install konqueror-nsplugins flashplugin-nonfree</code></p>
<p><em>Konqueror -&#62; Settings -&#62;Configure Konqueror -&#62; Plugins.-&#62;Scan for new plugins</em></p>
<p>Restart Konqueror.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Solidworks 2009 vs. Inventor 2009]]></title>
<link>http://3dcad.wordpress.com/?p=80</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 06:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>3dcad</dc:creator>
<guid>http://3dcad.pl.wordpress.com/2008/10/07/solidworks-2009-vs-inventor-2009/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Last weekend I have met my school-mate Sergio who is currently working with Solidworks. It was a goo]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last weekend I have met my school-mate Sergio who is currently working with Solidworks. It was a good opportunity to play a favourite "who is better" game. He proudly presented the new Solidworks 2009 <em>("SWX 2009" as he writes)</em> but I have seen amazingly many similarities to the Inventor 2009 version.</p>
<ul>
<li>Performance - I cannot judge as he was using a different hardware configuration than me, but Sergio has admitted that the promised performance gain is not that great</li>
<li>New icons - same as in Inventor: not that much important for us users</li>
<li>64-bit version - Inventor has it already</li>
<li>SpeedPak - assembly simplification - looked interesting, in Inventor we are using LOD and other similar functions</li>
<li>Geometry sensors in assemblies - it is called AutoLimits in Inventor (already there)</li>
<li>BOM in assemblies - Inventor has it for many releases</li>
<li>Filters in BOM - Inventor has it</li>
<li>Dual dimensions - Inventor has it</li>
<li>Assemblies larger than 1000m - I doubt many designers will need it but I have tried it in Inventor and it works there, no problems</li>
<li>CircuitWorks - electrical functionality - some of the functions are there in Inventor Pro, much more is in AutoCAD Electrical</li>
<li>Ribbon cables - already there in Inventor Pro 2009</li>
</ul>
<p>There seems to be nothing new about the DWG. DWG file format compatibility is still very limited in Solidworks. And although Sergio claimed it works for him in most cases, we have digged out a couple of DWG files which were loaded incompletely into Solidworks' DWG Editor but loaded smoothly into Inventor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New Adobe Cs4 Products!]]></title>
<link>http://gadgetbitz.wordpress.com/?p=5</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>gadgetbitz</dc:creator>
<guid>http://gadgetbitz.pl.wordpress.com/2008/10/05/new-adobe-cs4-products/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[That’s right folks, we’re already talking about the next installment of Adobe’s flagship Creat]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That’s right folks, we’re already talking about the next installment of Adobe’s flagship Creative Applications.These include <a href="http://www.adobe.com/go/EN_US_P_FP_5_L">Illustrator CS4</a>,<a href="http://www.adobe.com/go/EN_US_P_FP_7_L">Flash CS4 Professional</a>,<a href="http://www.adobe.com/go/EN_US_P_FP_9_L">After Effects CS4 Professional</a>,<a href="http://www.adobe.com/go/EN_US_P_FP_6_L">Dreamweaver CS4</a>,<a href="http://www.adobe.com/go/EN_US_P_FP_8_L">Premiere Pro CS4</a>,<a href="http://www.adobe.com/go/EN_US_P_FP_10_L">InDesign CS4</a>, and last but not least <a href="http://www.adobe.com/go/EN_US_P_FP_4_L">Photoshop CS4 Extended</a>! The programs have huge imporvments from their previous versions but <a href="http://www.adobe.com/go/EN_US_P_FP_4_L">Photoshop CS4 Extended</a> seems to have the most. The Windows version of all the Apps comes in both 32-bit and 64-bit flavors for more speed. Mac version of the Cs4 products are stuck on 32-bit.</p>
<p><a href="http://gadgetbitz.wordpress.com/files/2008/10/cs4_master_bxshot_3in_png.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6" title="cs4_master_bxshot" src="http://gadgetbitz.wordpress.com/files/2008/10/cs4_master_bxshot_3in_png.png" alt="" width="230" height="243" /></a><a href="http://gadgetbitz.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/boxshot-200x200-1.gif"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-8" title="boxshot-200x200-1" src="http://gadgetbitz.wordpress.com/files/2008/10/boxshot-200x200-1.gif" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a></p>
<p>For More info check out:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/"></a>http://www.adobe.com/products/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[32-bit vs. 64-bit CRM SDK Assemblies]]></title>
<link>http://javista.wordpress.com/?p=154</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 08:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Imad HAJJAR</dc:creator>
<guid>http://blogs.javista.com/2008/10/02/32-bit-vs-64-bit-crm-sdk-assemblies/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[As you may have noticed, recent updates to the Microsoft Dynamics CRM 4.0 SDK now include two differ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you may have noticed, recent updates to the Microsoft Dynamics CRM 4.0 SDK now include two different sets of SDK assemblies. This had led many of you to ask when the different sets of assemblies should be used. Luckily enough, most of the time there is no wrong choice because the Common Language Runtime and CRM will take care of the heavy lifting without you even knowing. However, depending on the type of application being developed and how your code will execute, there are some things to be aware of and associated actions you can take to ensure that your solution can easily be ported to any CRM 4.0 deployment.</p>
<p><span style="font-size:medium;">Common Language Runtime Support</span></p>
<p>For the sake of this discussion, I’m going to assume some familiarity with the Common Language Runtime (CLR) and .NET development, but will dive into some of the details regarding its support for 32-bit and 64-bit applications. The 2.0 release of the CLR introduced a 64-bit version in addition to the already existing 32-bit version. Along with this, the capability to have your .NET code compiled to target a specific platform was also introduced. For instance, when developing with C# and Visual Basic, the developer can pass in the /platform switch to the compiler with potential values of x86, Itanium, x64, or anycpu with anycpu being the default if the switch is not provided. As you can see, this allows the developer to control exactly what platforms the compiled .NET code can execute on. For executables, what happens is relatively straightforward – x86 compiled executables run in 32-bit mode on all systems (WOW64 on 64-bit operating systems), x64 will only execute on computers that support the AMD64 or EM64T instruction sets, and for executables compiled with anycpu, the application will run as a 64-bit process on 64-bit operating systems and a 32-bit process on 32-bit operating systems. Similarly, .NET class libraries can be loaded by an executable only if they support the platform that the loading executable is running under. Therefore, a 32-bit process cannot load a .NET class library that is compiled as x64 assembly only and a 64-bit process cannot load an assembly that is compiled to be x86 only. However, if the class library is compiled as anycpu, it can be loaded by both 32-bit and 64-bit processes.</p>
<p>You can refer to the articles referenced at the end of this article for more information regarding how to build 64-bit applications using the CLR and the .NET Framework.</p>
<p><span style="font-size:medium;">CRM 4.0 SDK Assemblies</span></p>
<p>To determine what platform a specific assembly is compiled to target, you can use the CorFlags.exe tool included with the .NET SDK. Simply running it with the file that you want to examine as a command line argument, you will be able to gather enough information to determine what platforms the targeted file supports. For instance, here’s what the output looks like when running CorFlags.exe on the 32-bit version of Microsoft.Crm.SdkTypeProxy.dll.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/blogfiles/crm/WindowsLiveWriter/32bitvs.64bitCRMSDKAssemblies_7369/clip_image001_2.jpg"><img style="border-width:0;" src="http://blogs.msdn.com/blogfiles/crm/WindowsLiveWriter/32bitvs.64bitCRMSDKAssemblies_7369/clip_image001_thumb.jpg" border="0" alt="clip_image001" width="644" height="321" /></a></p>
<p>The important pieces of information here are the PE and 32BIT values. The breakdown for the various different platform targets and their associated values are as follows:</p>
<p> </p>
<table class="MsoTableGrid" style="border-collapse:collapse;border-style:none;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="width:159.6pt;border:black 1pt solid;padding:0 5.4pt;" width="213" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0;line-height:normal;text-align:center;" align="center"><span style="font-family:v;">/platform Switch </p>
<p></span></p>
<p> </td>
<td style="border-right:black 1pt solid;border-top:black 1pt solid;border-left-width:1pt;border-left-color:black;width:159.6pt;border-bottom:black 1pt solid;padding:0 5.4pt;" width="213" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0;line-height:normal;text-align:center;" align="center"><span style="font-family:v;">PE </p>
<p></span></p>
<p> </td>
<td style="border-right:black 1pt solid;border-top:black 1pt solid;border-left-width:1pt;border-left-color:black;width:159.6pt;border-bottom:black 1pt solid;padding:0 5.4pt;" width="213" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0;line-height:normal;text-align:center;" align="center"><span style="font-family:v;">32BIT </p>
<p></span></p>
<p> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border-top-width:1pt;border-right:black 1pt solid;border-left:black 1pt solid;width:159.6pt;border-top-color:black;border-bottom:black 1pt solid;padding:0 5.4pt;" width="213" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-family:v;">anycpu </p>
<p></span></p>
<p> </td>
<td style="border-right:black 1pt solid;width:159.6pt;border-top-style:none;border-bottom:black 1pt solid;border-left-style:none;padding:0 5.4pt;" width="213" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0;line-height:normal;text-align:center;" align="center"><span style="font-family:v;">PE32 </p>
<p></span></p>
<p> </td>
<td style="border-right:black 1pt solid;width:159.6pt;border-top-style:none;border-bottom:black 1pt solid;border-left-style:none;padding:0 5.4pt;" width="213" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0;line-height:normal;text-align:center;" align="center"><span style="font-family:v;">0 </p>
<p></span></p>
<p> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border-top-width:1pt;border-right:black 1pt solid;border-left:black 1pt solid;width:159.6pt;border-top-color:black;border-bottom:black 1pt solid;padding:0 5.4pt;" width="213" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-family:v;">x86 </p>
<p></span></p>
<p> </td>
<td style="border-right:black 1pt solid;width:159.6pt;border-top-style:none;border-bottom:black 1pt solid;border-left-style:none;padding:0 5.4pt;" width="213" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0;line-height:normal;text-align:center;" align="center"><span style="font-family:v;">PE32 </p>
<p></span></p>
<p> </td>
<td style="border-right:black 1pt solid;width:159.6pt;border-top-style:none;border-bottom:black 1pt solid;border-left-style:none;padding:0 5.4pt;" width="213" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0;line-height:normal;text-align:center;" align="center"><span style="font-family:v;">1 </p>
<p></span></p>
<p> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border-top-width:1pt;border-right:black 1pt solid;border-left:black 1pt solid;width:159.6pt;border-top-color:black;border-bottom:black 1pt solid;padding:0 5.4pt;" width="213" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-family:v;">64-bit </p>
<p></span></p>
<p> </td>
<td style="border-right:black 1pt solid;width:159.6pt;border-top-style:none;border-bottom:black 1pt solid;border-left-style:none;padding:0 5.4pt;" width="213" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0;line-height:normal;text-align:center;" align="center"><span style="font-family:v;">PE32+ </p>
<p></span></p>
<p> </td>
<td style="border-right:black 1pt solid;width:159.6pt;border-top-style:none;border-bottom:black 1pt solid;border-left-style:none;padding:0 5.4pt;" width="213" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0;line-height:normal;text-align:center;" align="center"><span style="font-family:v;">0 </p>
<p></span></p>
<p> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Based on this chart, we can see that this is indeed the 32-bit version of the Microsoft.Crm.SdkTypeProxy assembly. If we ran the same command on the 64-bit version, we’d see that it is compiled with the anycpu value. I won’t get into the details about why these are compiled as such, but given this information, we can start seeing where the problems might pop up during solution development and when it is appropriate to use the two different sets of CRM 4.0 SDK assemblies.</p>
<p>For more information regarding CorFlags.exe, refer to the link at the end of this post.</p>
<p><span style="font-size:medium;">CRM 4.0 Solution Development</span></p>
<p>Now that we have understand of some of the details about how the CLR executes .NET code in 32-bit and 64-bit processes and the differences between the two sets of CRM 4.0 SDK assemblies, let’s talk about what it takes to build a portable solution against the CRM 4.0 SDK. There are several different places where you may write code that links against the SDK assemblies, so let’s walk through each of them.</p>
<h4>Plug-ins</h4>
<p>Plug-ins could be one of the more challenging ones to get correct given the different factors making up who will actually end up executing the code. If the plug-in is registered to execute synchronously, it will execute in the IIS worker process, if the plug-in is registered to execute asynchronously, its execution will be in the MSCRM Asynchronous service, and if the plug-in is available offline, it will run in the Outlook client hosting process. Depending on the complexity of the CRM topology that your plug-in is running in, the “bitness” of the various processes that will execute your plug-in may be incompatible with each other. In this case, the best solution would be to see if you can compile your plug-in code using the anycpu option as this would allow your plug-in to execute in each of these processes without any changes. If you require your plug-in to be compiled platform specific, then you will need to take into account how the plug-in is going to be registered, the processes that may execute the plug-in, and ensure that your plug-in is compiled in a manner that is consistent with the bitness with which those processes will run. This may, however, limit the portability of your solution and require that you have different plug-in assemblies for the different environments you plan on deploying your plug-ins in.</p>
<h4>Custom Workflow Activities</h4>
<p>Custom workflow activity assemblies pose many of the same challenges as plug-ins. The one scenario we can rule out is having the custom workflow activity executing in the Outlook client hosting process. However, both the IIS worker process and MSCRM Asynchronous service may load the custom workflow activity assembly at various points in a workflow’s lifetime. Therefore, like plug-ins, if you can compile your custom workflow activity assembly with the anycpu option, you can rely on the CLR and CRM to do the heavy lifting for you. If you need to compile your custom workflow activity assembly to be platform specific, you’ll need to ensure that you are registering a version of the assembly that is compatible with the CRM processes that it will execute in for the environments you want it to have it registered.</p>
<h4>SDK Client Applications</h4>
<p>This type of solution is the one that developers hit most often as the code is not executing from within CRM, but rather an external process that is reading and writing data from CRM via the SDK. When the code is executing within a CRM process, the CRM setup process will ensure that the correct SDK assemblies are in place to ensure that your solution can execute given the CLR restrictions already discussed. However, when calling the SDK from outside of CRM, your application needs to link to the appropriate SDK assemblies so that they can be loaded into your process. Luckily, this is easy to fix using the two sets of assemblies that are now included in the CRM 4.0 SDK. If we look back at the information we gathered from CorFlags.exe earlier, you’ll remember that the 32-bit SDK assemblies are compiled to target x86 and that 64-bit SDK assemblies are compiled to target anycpu. Given this information, simply linking against the 64-bit SDK assemblies from your client application will do the trick as these can be loaded in both 32-bit processes as well as 64-bit processes. If you are building a SDK client application that is going to execute as a 32-bit process only, then you can use either set of the SDK assemblies without running into any issues.</p>
<p><span style="font-size:medium;">Putting It All Together </span></p>
<p>As we’ve discussed, there are two sets of CRM 4.0 SDK assemblies – one for 32-bit and one for 64-bit. This may pose problems at runtime for your code, but with a few simple checks and some configuration when building your code, you can make your solution portable across the various environments where your code may execute. The simplest solution is to build your code using the anycpu so that it can target both 32-bit and 64-bit processes and let the CLR and CRM take care of the rest. Luckily enough, this is the default setting in Visual Studio, so you don’t even need to do anything to add this capability to your solution. Just remember to link against the 64-bit version of the SDK assemblies if you are going to potentially run your anycpu code from outside of CRM. If you do need to compile your code to target a specific platform, then you are going to limit the portability of your solution. In this case, you will need to verify that the platform that your code is compiled to target is the same platform that CRM is going to be executing in when tries to execute your code.</p>
<p>To get the CRM SDK assemblies I’ve referred to, you can <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=82E632A7-FAF9-41E0-8EC1-A2662AAE9DFB&#38;displaylang=en">download the latest version of the SDK</a>.</p>
<p><span style="font-size:medium;">Additional Resources:</span></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/zekwfyz4.aspx">/platform Compiler Switch</a></li>
<li><a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms973190.aspx#64mig_topic4">64-bit Applications</a></li>
<li><a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms973190.aspx#64mig_topic4">Migrating 32-bit Managed Code to 64-bit</a></li>
<li><a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms164699(VS.80).aspx">CorFlags.exe documentation</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/crm/pages/bio-nirav-shah.aspx" target="_blank">Nirav Shah</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Acer 4530 64bit driver]]></title>
<link>http://expertester.wordpress.com/?p=533</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 03:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>expertester</dc:creator>
<guid>http://expertester.pl.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/acer-4530-64bit-driver/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ 
Finally, 4 GB of RAMs is no longger an issue.
For those who are still trying to install Vista 64bi]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--[if gte mso 9]&#62; &#60;![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]&#62; Normal   0               false   false   false      EN-MY   X-NONE   X-NONE &#60;![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]&#62; &#60;![endif]--><!--  --><!--[if gte mso 10]&#62; &#60;!   /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable 	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; 	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; 	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; 	mso-style-noshow:yes; 	mso-style-priority:99; 	mso-style-qformat:yes; 	mso-style-parent:""; 	mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; 	mso-para-margin-top:0cm; 	mso-para-margin-right:0cm; 	mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; 	mso-para-margin-left:0cm; 	line-height:115%; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:11.0pt; 	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; 	mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; 	mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; 	mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; 	mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; 	mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} --> <!--[endif]--></p>
<p>Finally, 4 GB of RAMs is no longger an issue.</p>
<p>For those who are still trying to install Vista 64bit or Windows Server 2008 64 bit to fully utilize your 3 or 4 GBs of RAM, good news. All the required drivers now available.</p>
<p>However, straight from Acer driver DVD disc, graphic and motherboard chipset driver for 64bit OS is not included. Due to that very own reason, I upload both driver here.</p>
<p><strong>Download Acer 4530 Graphics and Chipset driver here :</strong></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li><a href="http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?tdi0inyzmxz" target="_blank"><strong>Acer 4530 Vista      x64 MCP Chipset Driver</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.laptopvideo2go.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=19031" target="_blank"><strong>Acer 4530 Vista x64 9100M Graphic Driver (175.61)</strong></a></li>
</ul>
<p>Yep, I realize, new version of 9100M custom INF has been release but due to some unknown reason, whenever i try those version (176.37 for example, my vista index down from 4.1 to 4.0). 175.61 is the driver I used to achieve 4.1 vista index.</p>
<p>However, if you wanna test and experiment it by yourself, feel free to check this link : <a href="http://www.laptopvideo2go.com/forum/index.php?showforum=88" target="_blank"><strong>17x Series GeForce Driver</strong></a></p>
<p>Step :</p>
<p>Download both drivers (graphic and chipset) from the link above.</p>
<p>Install chipset driver first and restart. Then install graphic driver. Put your Acer driver disc in your optical drive and install other driver (bluetooth, wireless lan, ethernet lan, sound, quickbutton etc)- (for vista) as usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Mozilla Minefield 3.1b1pre Release (64-Bit)]]></title>
<link>http://xtremegaming.wordpress.com/?p=272</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 00:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nile "Scolirk" Livesey</dc:creator>
<guid>http://xtremegaming.pl.wordpress.com/2008/10/01/mozilla-minefield-31b1pre-release-64-bit/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[As you know, I have been having a lot of issues with 64 Bit compatability for my PC over the past fe]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" title="Mozilla Minefield" src="http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b181/Scolirk/Minefieldsmall.jpg" alt="" width="129" height="129" /><strong>As you know, I have been having a lot of issues with 64 Bit compatability for my PC over the past few weeks, and things have been getting worse. Lucky for me, I stumbled across something called Minefield by Mozilla, the makers of FireFox. This is a 64-Bit beta version of FireFox 3.1. The official build code is 3.1b1pre, which was released today.</strong></p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>Now I assume you have the same questions I had when I heard of Minefield. Is it real? Is it FireFox? And can I trust it? I was able to quickly get answers for all those questions by installing the software. They are all yes. This is a "secret" type of beta for FireFox, which is why it's called Minefield. I suppose they gave it this name as the software is about as reliable as one, if you arent careful, it might blow you up.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="Acid3 Test on Minefield" src="http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b181/Scolirk/acid3minefield.jpg" alt="" width="462" height="314" />So why would you download this browser? Well there is no real reason to get it unless you want a 64-Bit version of FireFox. There are some improvements to the software such as speed and most reliability. It scored 89/100 on the Acid3 compatability test. FireFox 3 only scored 71, and Internet Explorer 8 is in the negatives. (Visit http://acid3.acidtests.org for the test). So far the release is promising. I have it both for my Mac and my PC, running in 64-Bit on both (I assume it is on the Mac at least). Mozilla will have to work harder to reach the 100/100 goal which Safari 4 has achieved, and the iPhone Safari has achieved a 74/100.</p>
<p>Minefield will become the new FireFox 3.1 release, in which point Mozilla will be breaking off their development into two sections, further development of FF3.1, and FireFox 4.0. As mentioned before, this beta version seems to run quite well on my machines. There is still no Adobe Flash support, but then again we cannot expect to see a 64-Bit flash from Adobe before the next decade.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="Warning Message" src="http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b181/Scolirk/notfinal.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="182" /></p>
<p>Above is a picture of the Minefield start page. As mentioned, Mozilla is serious when it comes to notifying users that Minefield is not a final or pre-release beta. Most may get scared off if they see this message, however there is no reason the average consumer should download this program anyway. FireFox 3 works well (after the first couple days of course), and most users should stick to that for the time being. However, if you feel the need to try this app out, you can download it from http://www.mozilla.org/projects/minefield/. This will not override any installation of FireFox on your computer, however you cannot use either program while the other is running.</p>
<p>There is no current timeframe as to when 3.1 or 4.0 will be released. Beta and Alpha software releases for both FireFox 3.1 and Minefield are available to download with the most current builds. Visit http://www.mozilla.com for more information on each product.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="About Minefield" src="http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b181/Scolirk/minefield.jpg" alt="" width="548" height="546" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[This is my new post]]></title>
<link>http://imbagamer.wordpress.com/?p=3</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 11:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>yaswanth1</dc:creator>
<guid>http://imbagamer.pl.wordpress.com/2008/10/01/this-is-my-new-post/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[This my new post
he fastest way for most people to get Ubuntu is by downloading the CD Installer. Th]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This my new post</p>
<p>he fastest way for most people to get Ubuntu is by downloading the CD Installer. The CD Installer is nearly 700MB. If you don't have a fast internet connection you may want to consider requesting a CD.</p>
<div id="getubuntupage" style="display:block;">
<div id="getubuntutabs">
<ul>
<li class="downloadtab active"><a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download">Download Ubuntu</a></li>
<li class="buytab"><a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/purchase">Buy Ubuntu on CD</a></li>
<li class="shipittab"><a href="https://shipit.ubuntu.com/">Request free CDs</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div id="getubuntucontent">
<div id="whichrelease">
<h3>Which release do you want?</h3>
<p>Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Desktop Edition - Supported to 2011  Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Server Edition - Supported to 2013</p>
<p style="clear:both;"><em>The "LTS" version of Ubuntu receives long-term support. 3 years for desktop versions and 5 years for server versions.</em></p>
</div>
<div id="arch">
<h3>What type of computer do you have?</h3>
<p>Standard personal computer (x86 architecture, Pentium<em class="tiny">TM</em>, Celeron<em class="tiny">TM</em>, Athlon<em class="tiny">TM</em>, Sempron<em class="tiny">TM</em>)  64bit AMD and Intel computers&#60;!--  				 Sun UltraSPARC based (server only) --&#62;</div>
<div id="location">
<h3 style="position:relative;">Choose a location near you</p>
<table id="locationdialog" style="height:81px;position:absolute;left:250px;bottom:0;display:none;opacity:0;border-style:none;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="padding:0;" width="58" height="81"><img src="http://www.ubuntu.com/files/dialog/dialog-dl-left.png" alt="" width="58" height="81" /></td>
<td style="background:transparent url(http://www.ubuntu.com/files/dialog/dialog-dl-bg.png) repeat-x scroll 0 50%;padding:0;"><strong>Please choose a download location near you</strong></td>
<td style="padding:0;" width="20"><img src="http://www.ubuntu.com/files/dialog/dialog-dl-right.png" alt="" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</h3>
<p>Please Choose a Location <!-- MIRROR LIST --> Europe Austria Ubuntu.gds.tuwien.ac.at Belgium BELNET Belgium Infogroep Belgium Ubuntu.mirrors.skynet.be Bosnia and Herzegovina BiHnet ISP, BH Telecom Bulgaria IPACCT Bulgaria Linux-BG.org Bulgaria nano-box by botevgrad.com Croatia Faculty of civil engineering, Zagreb Czech Republic Advokatni kancelar Kindl&#38;Partneri Czech Republic Releases.ubuntu.cz Czech Republic Ubuntu-releases.sh.cvut.cz Denmark KLID Denmark Tyroll.dk Finland CSC / Funet France Free France CRIHAN France Orange Business Services France CIRIL France Université de Picardie France Florian Entreprise France Ubuntu.florianentreprise.com France Flosoft.biz France Ftp.lip6.fr France Mirrors.dotsrc.org Germany De.archive.ubuntu.com-release Germany Esslingen University of Applied Sciences Germany University of Kaiserslautern Germany intergenia AG Germany Freie Universität Berlin Germany RRZN, Leibniz Universität Hannover Germany StudNet Bonn Germany Universitaet Bayreuth Germany Univerity of Muensters Germany GWDG Germany University of Mannheim Germany Host Europe Germany Technische Universitaet Clausthal Germany University of Applied Sciences Wolfenbuettel Germany Ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de Germany Ftp.tu-chemnitz.de Germany Releases.ubuntu.mirror.at.stealer.net Germany Snert.mi.hs-heilbronn.de Great Britain (UK) Oxford University Computing Services Great Britain (UK) University Of Kent UK Mirror Service Great Britain (UK) Canonical Ltd Great Britain (UK) The Positive Internet Company Great Britain (UK) Virgin Media Greece University of Crete Greece Democritus University of Thrace Greece National Technical University of Athens Greece OTENET Greece University Of Ioannina Greece University of Crete - Faculty of Medicine Hungary Ftp.arrabonus.hu Hungary FSN.hu Foundation Hungary bitmind kft. Iceland Ubuntu.hugi.is Ireland HEAnet Italy University of Rome - La Sapienza Italy University of Naples Federico II C.S.I. Italy Fastbull Italy ICT Valle Umbra s.r.l. Latvia Ftp.linux.edu.lv Netherlands BIT B.V. Netherlands University of Twente Netherlands Telfort Internet Netherlands Technische Universiteit Delft Netherlands Mirrors.kernel.org Netherlands PCextreme B.V. Netherlands MuntInternet Netherlands Ftpserv.tudelft.nl Norway The Student Society in Trondhjem, Norway Norway Ftp.uninett.no Poland Telekomunikacja Polska Poland Wroclaw Centre for Networking and Supercomputing Poland Vectra Poland Ftp.man.szczecin.pl Poland Piotrkosoft.net - Data Storage Center Poland Ubuntu.task.gda.pl Portugal CeSIUM Portugal nfsi telecom Portugal NEACM - University of Porto Portugal GLUA Portugal Ftp.rnl.ist.utl.pt Portugal Tux.cprm.net Portugal DEI-FCTUC, University of Coimbra Romania UPC Romania Romania Ftp.iasi.roedu.net Romania Ftp.lug.ro Serbia RC ETF Serbia RC ETF Serbia and Montenegro RC ETF Serbia and Montenegro Mirror2.etf.bg.ac.yu Slovakia YNET &#38; kubuntu.sk Slovakia Antik computers &#38; communications s.r.o. Slovakia Technical University of Kosice Spain CICA Spain Universidade da Coruña Spain Ourense Software Libre Spain University of Zaragoza Spain RedIRIS Spain Caliu Spain Delegación de Alumnos de Teleco - ETSIT - UPM Spain GRN Serveis telemàtics Spain Ftp.gui.uva.es Sweden Academic Computer Club, Umeå University Sweden DF - The Computer Society at Lund University and Lund Institute of Technology. Sweden Sunet FTP archive Sweden Mirrors.kernel.org Sweden Ftp.port80.se Switzerland SWITCH Ukraine Releases.ubuntu.org.ua North America Canada Cogeco Cable Inc. Canada University of Waterloo Computer Science Club Canada Portafixe Mexico UNAM United States Argonne National Laboratory United States University of Chicago - Astronomy Department Public Mirror United States National Severe Storms Lab United States Portland State University United States Northeastern University College of Computer and Information Science United States easynews.com-releases United States Gigenet United States Mirrors.kernel.org United States Xmission United States University of Utah United States Walla Walla University United States MIT Media Lab United States Georgia Tech. Software Library United States Michigan Tech Linux Users Group United States University of Idaho United States University of California at Merced United States OSU Open Source Lab United States University of Minnesota Ubuntu Releases United States Ftp-mirror.internap.com United States University of California, Santa Barbara United States Ftp.ussg.iu.edu United States Ftp.wayne.edu United States Mirror.cs.umn.edu United States Mirrors.brianm.name United States Mirrors.cs.wmich.edu United States CERIAS, Purdue University United States University of Colorado at Boulder United States Ubuntu.cs.wisc.edu Asia Armenia ADC China Mirror.lupaworld.com Cyprus Cytanet Georgia Open Consultants Hong Kong Hostrino Indonesia PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Indonesia PT. Supra Primatama Nusantara (BizNet ISP) Israel Israel Internet Association Israel INTERHOST Japan JAIST Japan Information Technology Center, the University of Tokyo. Japan RIKEN Japan Yamagata University Japan mithril-linux.org (offered by Debian-JP Project member) Japan KDDI R&#38;D Laboratories Inc. Korea, Republic of Daum Communications Corp. Pakistan Lahore University of Management Sciences Russian Federation Corbina Telecom Russian Federation COMSTAR-Direct Russian Federation Yandex Taiwan NCTUCC Taiwan TaiChung County Education Network Center Taiwan National Center for High-Performance Computing Taiwan National Taitung University Taiwan National Taiwan University Taiwan Shu-Te University Taiwan National Chi Nan University Thailand School of Information Technology, KMUTT Turkey Linux Kullanıcıları Derneği Turkey Istanbul Technical University Uzbekistan Sharq  Telekom Uzbekistan Sarkor-Telecom Viet Nam FPT Telecom South America Argentina Patan.com.ar Brazil Globo.com Brazil C3SL/UFPR Brazil Edugraf - INE - CTC - UFSC Chile TECNOERA Costa Rica Ftp.ucr.ac.cr Oceania/Australia Australia iiNet Australia Netspace Online Systems Australia mirror.aarnet.edu.au-releases Australia Optus Australia 3FL / Westnet Australia Internode Australia Soul Australia Australia Mirror.pacific.net.au Australia Planetmirror.com New Zealand Ftp.citylink.co.nz New Zealand ihug Africa Botswana TENET Lesotho TENET Mozambique TENET Namibia Polytechnic of Namibia South Africa TENET South Africa UCT LEG Swaziland TENET Zimbabwe TENET <!--END MIRROR LIST --><br />
//&#60;![CDATA[<br />
$$('#getubuntutabs li').each(function (tab) { tab.setOpacity(0.7); });<br />
$$('#getubuntutabs li.active').each(function (tab) { tab.setOpacity(1); tab.setStyle('z-index', 100); });</p>
<p>var myip = '58.136.61.61, 127.0.0.199';<br />
// var rnd = $random(0, 1222858119);<br />
// var xhr = new Ajax('/mirrorlookup?rnd='+rnd+'&#38;myip='+myip);</p>
<p>var selectmirror = function() {<br />
// $('debug').setValue(this.response.text);<br />
// console.log("ajax request said: "+this.response.text);<br />
var close_mirrors = Json.evaluate(this.response.text);<br />
if(!close_mirrors &#124;&#124; !close_mirrors.length) return;<br />
var selected_country = '';<br />
var lookup;<br />
for (var i = 0; i &#60; close_mirrors.length; i++) {<br />
lookup = 'option.'+close_mirrors[i];<br />
if($$(lookup).length &#62; 0){<br />
selected_country = close_mirrors[i];<br />
break;<br />
}<br />
}<br />
mirrors = $$(lookup);<br />
rnd = $random(0, (mirrors.length - 1));<br />
// console.log('rnd: '+rnd+' mirrors:');<br />
// console.log(mirrors);<br />
mirror_value = mirrors[rnd].value;<br />
// no automatic mirror select yet... we wait<br />
// $('mirror').setValue(mirror_value);<br />
}<br />
// window.addEvent('domready', function() {<br />
//	xhr.request().chain(selectmirror);<br />
// })</p>
<p>options = document.getElementsByTagName('option');<br />
continents = [];<br />
for(var i = 0; i&#60;options.length;i++) {<br />
if(options[i].disabled) {<br />
options[i].style.color = '#D90D19';<br />
options[i].style.fontWeight = 'bold';<br />
options[i].style.backgroundColor = '#f8f8f8';<br />
continents[continents.length] = options[i].value;<br />
}else{<br />
options[i].style.textIndent = '2em';<br />
}<br />
}<br />
function mirrorcheck() {<br />
if ($('mirror').selectedIndex &#60; 1) {<br />
$('locationdialog').setStyle('display','block');<br />
$('locationdialog').effect('opacity',{duration:500}).start(0,1);<br />
return false;<br />
}</p>
<p>}<br />
function hidewarning() {<br />
if($('locationdialog').getStyle('opacity').toInt() &#62; 0)<br />
$('locationdialog').effect('opacity',{duration:500}).start(1,0);<br />
}<br />
//]]&#62;</p></div>
<div><button> <img src="http://www.ubuntu.com/themes/ubuntu07/images/button-download-new.png" alt="download" /> Start Download </button><br />
Check here if you need the alternate desktop CD. This CD does not include the Live CD, instead it uses a text-based installer.</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>obj = document.getElementById('getubuntupage');<br />
obj.style.display = 'block';</p>
<p>This page is designed for computers that have JavaScript enabled. If you cannot or choose not to use enable javascript, we have provided an alternate page listing other download options.Feel free to view the <a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/downloadmirrors">complete list of download locations</a> and other download options, including BitTorrent downloads, Wubi - the Windows installer and past versions of Ubuntu.</p>
<p>Note to PowerPC (PPC) and SPARC users: These types of computers are not supported by the newest versions of Ubuntu. However Ubuntu 6.06 is still supported and available for your machine. Please use the <a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/downloadmirrors">complete list of download locations</a> to choose a location near you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Installing SQL Management Studio Express on Vista x64 - Tim Long]]></title>
<link>http://parkesy.wordpress.com/2008/09/30/installing-sql-management-studio-express-on-vista-x64-tim-long/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 22:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Andy Parkes</dc:creator>
<guid>http://parkesy.pl.wordpress.com/2008/09/30/installing-sql-management-studio-express-on-vista-x64-tim-long/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Just wanted to share as I had this exact problem&#8230;thanks Tim!
Also it&#8217;s so I don&#8217;t ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to share as I had this exact problem...thanks Tim!</p>
<p>Also it's so I don't forget how to do it!</p>
<p><a href="http://community.tigranetworks.co.uk/blogs/tim_long/archive/2008/06/04/installing-sql-management-studio-express-on-vista-x64.aspx">Installing SQL Management Studio Express on Vista x64 - Tim Long</a> </p>
<p>It's still very annoying that 64-bit Vista/XP still isn't on a par with 32-bit brethren as this <a href="http://parkesy.wordpress.com/2008/09/05/installing-windows-live-writer-on-vista-64-bit/">isn't the first time I've ran into problems</a> installing software but that rant can wait for another time :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Autodesk Revit 2009 Software Supports 64-Bit OS]]></title>
<link>http://thebimman.wordpress.com/?p=141</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>thebimman</dc:creator>
<guid>http://thebimman.pl.wordpress.com/2008/10/01/autodesk-2009-revit-software-supports-64-bit-os/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Finally - I&#8217;ve been using a 64-bit OS (XP) for over a year now and with each release of Revit ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally - I've been using a 64-bit OS (XP) for over a year now and with each release of Revit Architecture i've been hoping that it will ship with full support for a 64-bit system and finally today Autodesk has announced just that - Thank you!</p>
<p>This marks the company's first venture into 64-bit BIM applications and applies to Revit Architecture 2009, Revit Structure 2009 and Revit MEP 2009.</p>
<p>The English language versions of new 64-bit Revit software applications are available now to existing Revit Architecture 2009, Revit Structure 2009 and Revit MEP 2009 subscribers via the online Subscription Center. The 64-bit software will release in other languages at a later date. </p>
<p>For more information on the 64 bit versions of Revit refer to the following <a href="http://www.tenlinks.com/news/PR/AUTODESK/revit/093008_revit_64bit.htm">website</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Wondering about Windows 7?]]></title>
<link>http://deems.wordpress.com/?p=383</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 05:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Deems</dc:creator>
<guid>http://deems.pl.wordpress.com/2008/09/25/wondering-about-windows-7/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[By now you&#8217;ve proably heard all the hype around the new version of the Microsoft Windows OS to]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By now you've proably heard all the hype around the new version of the Microsoft Windows OS to be released sometime next year, currently called Windows 7 (although most feel  it will just be Windows Vista SP2). I'm still a Windows XP user and will be for sometime - but I just came across <a title="Don't go from XP to Vista unless you go 64-bit" href="http://windowssecrets.com/2008/09/25/03-Dont-go-from-XP-to-Vista-unless-you-go-64-bit" target="_blank"><strong>an article</strong></a> on the Windows Secrets website which got me thinking maybe the 64-bit route is the better route to go (making better use of your hardware and allowing the OS access to more physical RAM (since the cost have RAM has come down significantly in recent years).</p>
<p>If you've not seen any screen shots of Windows 7 yet, you can <a title="Windows 7 screenshots" href="http://download.windowssecrets.com/content/2008-09-25/Photos.html" target="_blank"><strong>see them here</strong></a> (some say a lot looks the same in Vista). It also appears that Microsoft are moving away from including accessories in their operating system (such as Movie Maker, Windows Mail, Windows Calendar, etc) and rather using the new Windows Live online applications (means less overhead on the machine for those applications to run and Microsoft don't need to push updates to your machine when needed).</p>
<p>One of the other reasons I was not in a rush to upgrade to Vista was because it was too early to ensure most hardware manufacturers had been able to provide updated drivers that would make their hardware compatible with Vista - a little over 18 months down the line and taking into account almost another year before Windows 7 is finally released to the public, maybe by then it might be safrer to upgrade to Windows 7 and not have many hardware problems like those plaguing early adopters of Vista.</p>
<p>And for those who want to stay with XP but are jealous of friends with Vista and want the same look and feel take a look at this <a href="http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/enhance-windows-xp-look-feel-the-easy-way/" target="_blank"><strong>How-To-Geek</strong></a> guide on tools to update your XP to look like Vista.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Two bits, four bits, sixty-four bits, a dollar....]]></title>
<link>http://computerhelpers.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/two-bits-four-bits-sixty-four-bits-a-dollar/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 20:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>dvanarsd</dc:creator>
<guid>http://computerhelpers.pl.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/two-bits-four-bits-sixty-four-bits-a-dollar/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Start64 is the site for those advancing to 64-bit operating systems, such as the 64 bit versions of ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://start64.com/">Start64</a> is the site for those advancing to 64-bit operating systems, such as the 64 bit versions of XP, Vista, and even Linux.</p>
<p>Good source of 64 bit software, including 64 bit versions of the older software you're familiar with.</p>
<p>Recommended by <a title="Dave's Computer Tips Newsletter" href="http://www.davescomputertips.com/newsletters/2008/080801.php" target="_blank">Dave's Computer Tips Newsletter</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[esperimenti]]></title>
<link>http://ulisse.wordpress.com/?p=348</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 09:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>ulisse</dc:creator>
<guid>http://ulisse.pl.wordpress.com/2008/09/20/esperimenti/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Dopo circa quattro mesi dall&#8217;inizio, ho posto fine all&#8217;esperimento del &#8220;Global Men]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dopo circa quattro mesi dall'<a href="http://ulisse.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/come-sul-mac/">inizio</a>, ho posto fine all'esperimento del "Global Menu" stile OSX.<br />
Su alcune applicazioni mi ci sono trovato bene, specialmente Gimp, ma quando sono tornato al sistema <em>tradizionale</em> ho provato come un senso di sollievo...<br />
Con buona pace di Alex Martelli (<em>promotore</em> del mio esperimento) e della legge di Fitts, il mio sollievo è probabilmente dovuto alla scarsa integrazione del Global menu nelle applicazioni che uso più di frequente (colpa delle applicazioni, nda) ed al comunque scarso uso che faccio della barra del menu: in genere uso quello contestuale o le scorciatoie da tastiera, o addirittura le <a href="http://www.mousegestures.org/">mouse gestures</a>.</p>
<p>Ho iniziato oggi invece un nuovo esperimento: l'uso del sistema a 64 bit. Fino ad ora l'avevo sempre evitato perchè mi pareva che, per l'uso medio, fossero più gli svantaggi ed i grattacapi che i vantaggi effettivi.<br />
Installata senza problemi la versione <a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/intrepid/alpha6">Alpha6</a> di Ubuntu Intrepid Ibex e per adesso tutto è filato liscio, anche quelle notoriamente <em>rompine</em> come l'installazione del plugin flash (che è solo a 32 bit), ed il sistema mi sembra un po' più snello, più scattante, ma forse è solo suggestione :)</p>
<p>Non sono proprio gli esperimenti dell'LHC, eh? :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Bill Quick 2008 SQL install on 2008 Express error]]></title>
<link>http://jbenisek.wordpress.com/?p=77</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>jbenisek</dc:creator>
<guid>http://jbenisek.pl.wordpress.com/2008/09/18/bill-quick-2008-sql-install-on-2008-express-error/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[If you use Bill Quick I have some warnings for you. Call them lessons learned.
Bill Quick Pro 2008 o]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you use Bill Quick I have some warnings for you. Call them lessons learned.</p>
<p>Bill Quick Pro 2008 or any date will not work with Microsoft SQL 2005, 2008 Standard or Enterprise according to bill quick they changed this support to only Bill Quick Enterprise only which cost a ton more.</p>
<p>Bill Quick Pro 2008 gives me an error when trying to do a Create New Database Error 880012 no message nothing but this error. I called BQE and they said just like they did for trying to Install Bill Quick on SQL 2005 Standard that you must install Bill Quick on the server and that will fix any of your problems. However, it didn't. I called back and they didn't have anyone that could help me and would have to call me back. Also couldn't speak with a manager because there wasn't one there.</p>
<p>So seems BQE's troubleshooting is down to:</p>
<ol>
<li>Blame SA/Password (over and over they kept blaming my password because it wasn't SA, stupid to leave it SA and SQL 2008 requres by default Strong Password Enforment which they should)</li>
<li>Blame SQL 2005 Standard for not being Express (odd but whatever money greedy corporations)</li>
<li>Blame Remote SQL Database Creation (they've said everytime try creating the database from the server by installing Bill Quick on your server, it's fast and you wont have to reboot) This isn't true I did have to reboot and it didn't fix or do anything different then trying it from my workstation. (They still say the reboot isn't required but the software does ask for it)</li>
</ol>
<p>Solution was <strong>Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Backward Compatibility Components</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> 
<ul><strong><a href="http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=123702&#38;clcid=0x409"><span style="color:#0033cc;">X86 Package</span></a></strong>(SQLServer2005_BC.msi) - 11273 KB<br />
<strong><a href="http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=123703&#38;clcid=0x409"><span style="color:#0033cc;">X64 Package</span></a></strong>(SQLServer2005_BC_x64.msi) - 18569 KB<br />
<strong><a href="http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=123704&#38;clcid=0x409"><span style="color:#0033cc;">IA64 Package</span></a></strong>(SQLServer2005_BC_ia64.msi) - 23510 KB</ul>
</li>
<p>The SQL Server Backward Compatibility package includes the latest versions of Data Transformation Services 2000 runtime (DTS), SQL Distributed Management Objects (SQL-DMO), Decision Support Objects (DSO), and SQL Virtual Device Interface (SQLVDI). These versions have been updated for compatibility with both SQL Server 2005 and SQL Server 2008 and include all fixes shipped through SQL Server 2000 SP4 and SQL Server 2005 SP2.</p>
<p>Audience(s): <strong>Customer, Partner, Developer</strong></ul>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OCS 2007 64-bit Support]]></title>
<link>http://ocsbuzz.wordpress.com/?p=86</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Curtis Johnstone</dc:creator>
<guid>http://ocsbuzz.wordpress.com/2008/09/17/ocs-2007-64-bit-support/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A frequent question is whether OCS 2007 supports 64-bit. The short answer is &#8220;no&#8221;, Offic]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"><span style="font-size:small;"><span style="font-family:Calibri;">A frequent question is whether OCS 2007 supports 64-bit. The short answer is "no", Office Communications Server 2007 is available only in a 32-bit edition. However, there are 2 notable exceptions:</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"><span style="font-size:small;font-family:Calibri;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"><span style="font-size:small;"><span style="font-family:Calibri;">1) WOW 64 support allows the 32-bit OCS 2007 to run on a 64-bit version of the Windows O/S</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"><span style="font-size:small;"><span style="font-family:Calibri;">2) The OCS backend role, which is a Microsoft SQL database, can be run on 64-bit editions of Windows Server (without WOW64)</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"><span style="font-size:small;font-family:Calibri;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"><span style="font-size:small;"><span style="font-family:Calibri;">The OCS 2007 Administrative Tools can also run on WOW64.</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"><span style="font-size:small;font-family:Calibri;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"><span style="font-size:small;"><span style="font-family:Calibri;">The Microsoft "Office Communications Server 2007 Document: Supportability Guide" http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=f8cc9b59-225f-425d-bd3a-e506396c6207 provides more details on 64-bit support, and specific Windows Server versions that OCS 2007 can run on. Page 9 and 12 detail support for 64-bit.</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"><span style="font-size:small;font-family:Calibri;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"><span style="font-size:small;"><span style="font-family:Calibri;">Microsoft has recently (late Aug 2008) committed to having full 64-bit support (in fact, no more 32-bit support) in the next release of OCS. More details can be found here: http://communicationsserverteam.com/archive/2008/08/29/246.aspx..</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Vista 64 Q&amp;A ]]></title>
<link>http://computerhelpers.wordpress.com/?p=770</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>dvanarsd</dc:creator>
<guid>http://computerhelpers.pl.wordpress.com/2008/09/09/vista-64-qa/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Ed Bott of ZDNet has a blog post &#8220;You&#8217;ve got Vista x64 questions&#8221; covering the tec]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed Bott of ZDNet has a blog post "<a title="You've got Vista x64 questions" href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=511&#38;tag=nl.e550" target="_blank">You've got Vista x64 questions</a>" covering the technical side of the 64-bit version of Windows Vista, which is showing up on a lot of mid- to high-end PCs.</p>
<p>It covers why 64-bit operating systems can handle more memory than 32-bit, does 64-bit actually use more memory routinely, is there an advantage to running 64-bit on only 1 or 2 GB memory PCs, compatibility questions, VPN client problems, and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[64-Bit OS Woes]]></title>
<link>http://xtremegaming.wordpress.com/?p=249</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nile "Scolirk" Livesey</dc:creator>
<guid>http://xtremegaming.pl.wordpress.com/2008/09/07/64-bit-os-woes/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The other day I decided to take the plunge and install the 64 Bit version of Windows Vista Ultimate ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b181/Scolirk/64bit-windows.jpg" alt="" width="279" height="267" />The other day I decided to take the plunge and install the 64 Bit version of Windows Vista Ultimate on my gaming PC. At first things went well, my files backed up fine, and my installation disk of vista didn't crap out on my like my older one did. It took several hours, but it completed without many problems. I figure that a 64Bit OS should have a much better time with almost all tasks it's required to do, however that doesn't seem to be the case as of yet.</p>
<p>I was initially impressed with the operating system. It told me I had 4GB of memory, something that the x86 OS wasn't able to detect, but mearly lied about. I was also rather impressed with the initial driver support. My Sound card finally worked, something that had been broken for about a month, video drivers worked at first with both monitors, and my keyboard and mouse work just the same as they did before.  However not all is fine and dandy in the land of Vista 64.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>My first issue was with the video drivers. I have two 20" monitors, and my Cinema Display has a higher brightness and colour than my LG. I changed the gamma settings inside my nVidia control panel to match both monitors as best as possible. However the Cinema Display would always return to the original colour if the monitor was shut off, or the screen saver was enabled, or the computer was reset. I would have to go into the nVidia control panel and change the gamma by just 1% for it to set back to the setup I had for it. This issue was fixed with SP1.</p>
<p><img class="alignright" src="http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b181/Scolirk/VistaRating.jpg" alt="" width="745" height="611" />Issue number Two came with my installation of the 64 Bit version of UltraMon, a multi monitor support program that gives you full control of your display settings. This program says it works with 64 bit systems, however it seems unpolished. The program does not work the same way at all as it did in the x86 version. I'm unable to change main features with the second smart-bar, such as opacity, and the ability to have 1 program on 1 monitor. As you can see from the screen shot below, The bar on the top is very different from the one on the bottom. The bottom bar is the UltraMon bar, and normally would look exactly the same as the Windows bar. Also there would not be the same program on each bar. This is a very annoying issue with this program, and is making me consider a change with my monitor set up.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b181/Scolirk/monitor.jpg" alt="" width="515" height="68" />For the most part, when it comes to drivers, you can find a 64 Bit version. My Saitek X52 joystick works with Vista 64 with no issues. FSX recognises it and allows me to play with it. Mice and keyboard controls work fine, and my sound card works better than ever. With 64 Bit processing being the way of the future for consumer computers, it is vital that software and hardware companies produce working drivers for both x86 and x64 systems. So far this support is great, however there is still one company that has not bothered to create a 64 Bit version of any software so far, and it is a very important addition that needs to be implemented.</p>
<p><img class="alignright" src="http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b181/Scolirk/flash.jpg" alt="" width="527" height="507" />Adobe Flash. Adobe currently does not support x64 with any of it's software. They did state that their new Creative Suite 4 programs will be 64 Bit compatible, but only on Windows based machines. Adobe Flash however is not supported on 64 Bit internet browsers, such as Internet Explorer 7 x64. You don't know how much you need flash until you can't use it anymore. This site requires flash for me to do almost everything, I am unable to use youtube, there are also issues on FaceBook, and PhotoBucket. Almost everything you want to do is impossible. I need to use the x86 version of IE7 in order to view these pages, which makes installing or using any 64 Bit browser useless. iPhone and 64 Bit Vista users have something in common now. This is a huge issue and needs to be addressed by Adobe soon. Consumer 64 Bit has been around since 2003, and even Saitek has created drivers. I know a joystick driver is much different than Flash, but the point is the same. Saitek knows it's customers want to use their product, so they put time into developing software. Adobe needs to do the same.</p>
<p>My final verdict on Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate 64 Bit Edition is still undecided. I don't plan on reinstalling a x86 version, however I am not as happy with the OS as I had hoped to be. Even with the slight speed increase, some of the short comings don't make the experience worth all the trouble. If you're a gamer, and you have 4GB of ram or more, than you will need to get the 64 Bit Vista on your system. It is definitely not for the average consumer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Installing Windows Live Writer on Vista 64-bit]]></title>
<link>http://parkesy.wordpress.com/2008/09/05/installing-windows-live-writer-on-vista-64-bit/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Andy Parkes</dc:creator>
<guid>http://parkesy.pl.wordpress.com/2008/09/05/installing-windows-live-writer-on-vista-64-bit/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m running Vista 64-bit so tried to install Live Writer a while back and got the following er]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm running Vista 64-bit so tried to install Live Writer a while back and got the following error</p>
<p><a href="http://parkesy.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/clip-image001.png"><img style="border-right:0;border-top:0;border-left:0;border-bottom:0;" height="198" alt="clip_image001" src="http://parkesy.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/clip-image001-thumb.png" width="418" border="0"></a>
<p>&#160;
<p>From what I've read it's to do with the unified Live installer and not Live Writer
<p>I've seen a couple of blog posts that mention if you can get the MSI file you can install it ok. Most of these posts had a link to a german site that has the file on it. I wasn't too keen to download an MSI file from a site I knew nothing about so decided against that.
<p>Another post suggested installing Live Writer on a 32-bit system and copy the MSI from there. I tried that and couldn't find the MSI so that was scuppered
<p>So I thought I'd try something obvious - what did I have to lose?
<p>Download the installer file (WLInstaller.exe) from the <a href="http://writer.live.com/" target="_blank">Live Writer site</a>, right click on the file and click properties then click the compatibility tab
<p>Put the tick in the box to run in compatibility mode and click ok
<p><a href="http://parkesy.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/clip-image0018.png"><img style="border-right:0;border-top:0;border-left:0;border-bottom:0;" height="220" alt="clip_image001[8]" src="http://parkesy.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/clip-image0018-thumb.png" width="412" border="0"></a>
<p>Then run the program as an administrator and it should work!
<p>&#160;
<p>I'm posting this on my Vista 64-bit system from Live Writer so it worked for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Firefox 64-bit]]></title>
<link>http://experiencetheexperience.wordpress.com/?p=27</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Rindra Putra</dc:creator>
<guid>http://experiencetheexperience.pl.wordpress.com/2008/09/04/firefox-64-bit/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ VS 
Klo udah ada yang baca posting gw mengenai gmana gw menggunakan OS 64-bit naahh, gw mo coba sha]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/minefield/minefield-icon.png" alt="" /> VS <img src="http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:Bj8xpYjnC061MM:joi.ito.com/Firefox-logo.png" alt="" /></p>
<p>Klo udah ada yang baca posting gw mengenai gmana gw menggunakan OS 64-bit naahh, gw mo coba share program-program yang juga didesain untuk arsitektur proc 64-bit...</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Software pertama yang pingin gw share disini ialah Firefox 64-Bit, kenapa? karena sebenernya cukup aneh klo developer sekelas mozilla tidak menyertakan versi 64-bit dari browser populernya, klo dicek ke websitenya di <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/">mozilla.com</a> atau <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/">mozilla.org</a> tidak ada informasi mengenai firefox 64-bit ini, setelah bertanya ke Google ditemukanlah <strong><a href="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/minefield/">Minefield</a></strong>... <!--more What it's Minefield ???--> oow ternyata mozilla buat project baru dengan nama <strong>Minefield</strong> ini sebagai beta release dari firefox 64-bit, bagi yang ingin mencoba Minefield versi terakhir bisa didownload <span style="color:#0000ff;"><strong><a href="http://wiki.mozilla-x86-64.com/images/Firefox-3.1a2pre.en-US.win64.installer.20080731.zip">disini</a></strong></span> atau langsung ke <strong><span style="color:#0000ff;"><a href="http://wiki.mozilla-x86-64.com/Download">halaman ini</a></span></strong> untuk lihat versi-versi sebelumnya dari rilis Minefield.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">setelah download selesai kita akan mendapatkan zip file sebesar 7.7 mb extract lalu lanjutkan installasi seperti installasi firefox biasa... oh iya selesai instal klo mau coba jendela firefox harus ditutup dulu klo g minefield g mau jalan karena instance dari firefox *32 masih berjalan di task manager..</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Setelah running, hmmm tenyata g ada perubahan significan kenapa ya?? ternyata untuk platform AMD64, SSE2 dari CPU AMD (Trion, Althon64 and Opetron) lebih lambat dari CPU Intel (kecuali Pentium M), karena MMX assembler tidak dapat bekerja dalam MSVC untuk AMD64, tetapi menurut <a href="http://www.mozilla-x86-64.com/">website ini</a> setelah melakukan benchmark terdapat perbedaan 15% saat decoding JPEG di win 64-bit.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">karena Minefield sendiri masih tahap beta, add-ons dari firefox yang sudah terinstall ternyata memilliki isu kompabillitas dengan Minefield hyuuh.. jadi untuk sementara ini masih pake Firefox dulu deh, nunggu rilis resminya hehehe...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Domino Notes 8 32-bit vs. 64-bit... when to use what when?]]></title>
<link>http://tokenblog.wordpress.com/?p=173</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 22:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Rainier</dc:creator>
<guid>http://tokenblog.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/domino-notes-8-32-bit-vs-64-bit-when-to-use-what-when/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Notes 8 Logo
Customer of mine is currently going through a migration of their Notes environment to N]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[[caption id="attachment_174" align="alignleft" width="93" caption="Notes 8 Logo"]<a href="http://tokenblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/nd8logo.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-174" src="http://tokenblog.wordpress.com/files/2008/09/nd8logo.jpg" alt="Notes 8 Logo" width="93" height="85" /></a>[/caption]
<p>Customer of mine is currently going through a migration of their Notes environment to Notes 8.0.1.  Of course, as any good customer would do, they want to re-evaluate their infrastructure and consulted with their favorite vendor, IBM.  One of the questions that came up was, would it behoove them if they switched from a 32-bit environment to a 64-bit environment in order to maximize performance and efficiency?</p>
<p>So here's the skinny and thanks to my teammate Matt Engstrom and IBM's Techline organization.  Windows itself can't use anything more than 4 GB of RAM per instance unless you're running 64-bit Windows.  If your organization is running 64-bit Windows, then you can also run 64-bit Domino, and take advantage of configurations that have more than 4 GB of RAM.</p>
<p>64-bit Domino is 100% compatible with both 32-bit Domino (so that you can run mixed server environments) and the Notes client.  The only thing to be aware of is that upgrading a 32-bit Domino server to 64-bits will take a little bit longer (maybe a couple of hours) because database indices need to be rebuilt with the 64-bit indexing engine.  It's a transparent process that happens automatically - no manual intervention required</p>
<p>Regarding 64-bit vs 32-bit support, the recommendation would be that if the servers are memory constrained then they would probably be better off with 64-bit, but if they are processor constrained then 64-bit probably wouldn't do much for them.  For details see: <a href="http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21296452">http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21296452</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Oh Gurus of Vista 64 and All Lesser Things ...]]></title>
<link>http://ratwarlock.wordpress.com/?p=178</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>araxes</dc:creator>
<guid>http://ratwarlock.pl.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/oh-gurus-of-vista-64-and-all-lesser-things/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[.. I have a question for you, out there!
I recently installed Vista 64 and a 9800 GT on a new dual-c]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.. I have a question for you, out there!</p>
<p>I recently installed Vista 64 and a 9800 GT on a new dual-core system ... EQ2 runs beautifully.  I don't have any horror stories like some others.</p>
<p>I do have a couple strange issues, though.</p>
<p>FIRST ONE:</p>
<p>When I am running around, sometimes after a few minutes of non-stop movement, the screen will seem to "halt" or play catch-up ... almost like something's not in sync ... one second it goes -real fast- the next second it slows down to what I would say is a "normal" pace.</p>
<p>From what I can tell, it isn't related to framerate. I mean, it's not the kind of stuttering you get when your system is chugging ... it's more like ...</p>
<p>It's more like something is trying to "throttle" the output, and not quite succeeding.</p>
<p>SECOND ISSUE:</p>
<p>I had previously enable anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering through the Nvidia control panel on my odl 7600GT .. however, now, even though I "force" it ... it won't appear in-game UNLESS I actually modify the EQ2_recent.ini file and add the lines /r_aa_blit 1  and   /r_af_blit_1   (I don't know if that second one actually works but I thought I noticed AF working after I added that line ... the aliasing one definitely works, though).</p>
<p>Is there some other thing I need to do in order NOT to have to enter those lines in and simply be able to enable it via hardware as I used to do, or are things just not going to work that way, anymore?  ;)  lol</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Please advise, if any of you know!</p>
<p>And yes, I have updated my drivers for both motherboard and graphics card, already.  (It's the first thing people seem to assume.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Conversion to ArchLinux 64 bit]]></title>
<link>http://tvwhere.wordpress.com/?p=44</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>bcjenkins</dc:creator>
<guid>http://tvwhere.pl.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/conversion-to-archlinux-64-bit/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Over the weekend I decided to migrate from Ubuntu 64-bit to ArchLinux 64-bit. My reasoning was fairl]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the weekend I decided to migrate from Ubuntu 64-bit to ArchLinux 64-bit. My reasoning was fairly simple. ArchLinux is designed to be a Linux distro which only includes what you need to run and you add on what you want to run.</p>
<p>My server sits in a dark room in the basement and all management is carried out via SSH on the console. As such I don't make use of X, KDE/Gnome, and other packages. I also don't want all of it installed for me either. When I finished the total footprint for the install was only 460MB!</p>
<p>The problem with running 64-bit is that SageTV is a 32-bit program. You need to install required 32-bit libraries for the application to function. Suffice it to say there is a solution and all the juicy details are after the break.</p>
<p>B</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>I began installing 32-bit libraries via the pacman interface and after a few files, LDD was still not working right. In my search for the answer I stumbled upon a new <a href="http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2008-July/006907.html">project</a> in the developer list. It seems that it is meeting with some resistance due to ArchLinux's approach to the 64-bit OS, but I agree with its principles. Determined to make use of this, I uninstalled all previously installed libraries, added multilib to my repositories, and pulled down the 3 required libraries for SageTV to function. (glibc, gcc, zlib)</p>
<p>There are other libraries which are missing from the multilib repository. They are</p>
<p>libTSnative.so<br />
libiec61883.so.0<br />
libraw1394.so.8<br />
libavc1394.so.0<br />
librom1394.so.0</p>
<p>I have sent a note to Thomas asking for instructions on setting up the compile environment. Hopefully, I will be able to add them soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[64 Bit...]]></title>
<link>http://experiencetheexperience.wordpress.com/?p=6</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Rindra Putra</dc:creator>
<guid>http://experiencetheexperience.pl.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/64-bit/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Ahhoyyy&#8230;
this is your captain speaking, kekeke.. this will be my second post dan gw coba cari ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhoyyy...</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">this is your <strong><span style="color:#000080;">captain</span></strong> speaking, kekeke.. this will be my second post dan gw coba cari kategori pertama buat blog gw ini, abis jiper ngeliat blog <a href="http://ricohsanusi.wordpress.com/">ricoh</a>..</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">ok let's start, diawali oleh pembelian laptop compaq v3802 yang dilakukan pada bulan juni 2008 gw dah niat pingin memaksimalkan pengunaan laptop gw, nah secara yang diinstall pada saat pembelian ialah vista basic home edition sedangkan proc yang digunakan <strong>AMD Turion(tm) 64 X2</strong> hmmm..</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">pada akhirnya setelah ditimbang maka diputuskan klo laptop gw beratnya sekitar <span><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Lucida Sans;">2.4 kg</span> </span>huehehehe... kembali ke laptop maka akhirnya diinstal lah <strong>vista ultimate 64</strong> kekeke.. sebenernya sih mo diinstalin <strong>Ubuntu</strong> tapi apa daya hardisk masih blom mencukupi, apalagi masih dibutuhkan buat nyimpen yang "seger-seger" dari GA2008 hehehe.. hehehe.. jadi intinya apa sih?? oleh karena digunakannya OS 64 bit oleh gw maka disini gw akan membahas kelebihan dari digunakannya aplikasi2 64 bit dan apa keunggulan dari OS 64 bit.</p>
<p><!--more Let's Learn more--><br />
<strong>32 bit vs 64 bit</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">jadi apa sih beda nya? oh ya lupa all of my post is based on my opinion so fell free to give me some comment if there is something wrong, hehehe..</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">oke kita mulai, salah satu benefit dari menggunakan 64-bit long: memberikan kesempatan untuk processor menembus batasan 4gb memory (&#60;i&#62;padahal laptop gw cuma support max 4gb juga de... &#60;/i&#62;) selain itu juga memberikan ruang untuk General purpose register sebanyak 2 kali lipat dibandingkan proc 32-bi t(bayangkan saudara-saudara <strong>2 kali lipat</strong> hehehe..) which explains why it is faster than a 32-bit processor/mode dan juga memberikan kemungkinan optimasi aplikasi 64-bit. BTW: Windows  Vista 64-bit lebih cepat 10.9 % dibandingkan versi 32-bit, data didapat dari hasil benchmark pake <a href="http://www.primatelabs.ca/geekbench/">GeekBench</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Tapi perubahan dari 32-bit ke 64-bit membutuhkan modifikasi Operating System yang tidak sedikit untuk dapat menggunakan kelebihan arsitektur yang baru ini. Dan selain itu software juga harus di porting untuk dapat menggunakan fungsi atau kemampuan baru yang lebih baik; sedangkan software yang lebih lama biasanya tetap di support melalui <em>hardware compatibility mode</em> (di mode ini processors baru tetap mensupport instruksi 32-bit sebaik 64-bit version), menggunakan software emulasi<a class="mw-redirect" title="Emulation" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emulation"></a>, atau implementasi 32-bit processor core didalam 64-bit processor (contonya Itanium processors dari Intel, yang mensertakan x86 processor core untuk menjalankan applikasi 32-bit x86). Oerating systems untuk arsitektur 64-bit  biasanya mensupport applikasi 32-bit dan 64-bit.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">64-bit arsitektur memang dapat membuat pekerjaan yang melibatkan data set yang besar dalam appliksi seperti digital vide, komputasi scientific, dan database yang besar menjadi lebih mudah, ada pertimbangan apakah dalam mode kompabilitas dapat lebih cepat  dibandingkan dijalankan dalam sistem 32-bit situ sendiri. Di arsitektur x86-64 (AMD64), sebagian besar operating system dan aplikasi-aplikasi 32-bit dapat berjalan dengan baik menggunakan hardware 64-bit. selain itu kecepatan bukan cuma satu-satunya faktor yang perlu diperhatikan dalam perbandingan processor 32-bit dan 64-bit. Aplikasi seperti multi-tasking, stress testing, dan clustering (untuk <a title="High-performance computing" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-performance_computing">high-performance computing</a>), HPC, lebih cocok untuk arsitektur 64-bit makanya IBM, HP and Microsoft banyak mengembangkan penggunaan 64-bit.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;"><strong>64-Bit Sofware Support</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Terkadang x86-based 64-bit systems kurang kompatible terhadap software yang dibuat untuk arsitektur 32-bit. Masalah yang umum di temui di Microsoft Windows ialah device driver yang tidak kompatible, walaupun rata-rata software dapat berjalan di 32-bit compatibility mode (atau <a class="mw-redirect" title="Emulation" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emulation">emulation</a> mode) atau berjalan di 32-bit mode secara native (AMD64), hampir tidak mungkin menjalankan driver menggunakan mode<br />
tersebut. Untungnya hardware/device yang dibuat saat ini sudah memiliki 64-bit driver.</p>
<p>Naahhh, oleh karena itu mungkin salah satu pembahasan di blog gw ini mengenai kesulitan yang saya dapat saat menggunakan 64-bit OS ini dan share informasi atau software 64-bit yang saya temui dalam perjalanan berselancar di dunia maya...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[SQL 2005 Express auf Windows Server 2008 64-bit]]></title>
<link>http://dotlab.wordpress.com/?p=24</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>dotlab</dc:creator>
<guid>http://dotlab.pl.wordpress.com/2008/09/01/sql-2005-express-auf-windows-server-2008-64-bit/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Unser neuer Stage Server läuft auf Basis einer 64-bit Windows 2008 VM. Um die Kompatibilität mit d]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unser neuer Stage Server läuft auf Basis einer 64-bit Windows 2008 VM. Um die Kompatibilität mit dem Livesystem zu wahren, waren wir gezwungen, einen SQL Server 2005 einzusetzen. Auf dem Stage Server ist die Express Edition für uns absolut ausreichend. Jedoch liess sich diese Version nicht ohne Weiteres installieren, die folgende Warnung wurde während dem Setup ausgegeben:</p>
<p>"64-bit ASP .Net is Registered. Required 32-bit ASP .Net to install Microsoft  Reporting Service 2005 (32.bit)"</p>
<p>Die Lösung liegt darin, als Administrator die Kommandozeile zu öffnen und folgenden Befehl auszuführen:</p>
<div><span style="font-family:Courier New;color:#000000;">cscript  %SystemDrive%\inetpub\AdminScripts\adsutil.vbs set  w3svc/AppPools/Enable32bitAppOnWin64 1</span></div>
<div></div>
<div>Et voilà, die Installation lief anschliessend sauber durch.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sound glitch in Boot Camp, x64]]></title>
<link>http://andersonshatch.wordpress.com/?p=158</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
<guid>http://blog.andersonshatch.com/2008/08/19/sound-glitch-in-boot-camp-x64/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I have known about this issue for a while and as of yet I haven&#8217;t found a good solution (thoug]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have known about this issue for a while and as of yet I haven't found a good solution (though, admittedly, I am yet to look for one!) and the reason as to why I'm posting this now is that I know I'm not alone in having this problem -- I got two <img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-159" style="margin:0 0 0 20px;" src="http://andersonshatch.wordpress.com/files/2008/08/macbook-pro.png?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="175" />hits from someone searching "no sound macbook pro vista ultimate 2008"</p>
<p>The problem occurs randomly, but I'm pretty sure that I see it more after my MacBook Pro has resumed from sleep in Vista (Ultimate 64 bit).</p>
<p>The problem is that no sound will play out of the speakers even though the system is unmuted and should be playing sounds!</p>
<p>The only way I have found to get around this is to insert some headphones/speakers into the headphone jack and then remove them. This always restores the sound for me..... But, I will get on to finding out if there is a better solution than this and I’ll update this post if I find anything.</p>
<p>Does this work for you? Or have you found some other way to restore sound? Please let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Windows XP and Windows Vista 32-bit and 64-bit]]></title>
<link>http://techqa.wordpress.com/?p=271</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>techqa</dc:creator>
<guid>http://techqa.pl.wordpress.com/2008/08/18/windows-xp-and-windows-vista-32-bit-and-64-bit/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been asked what is the difference between Windows XP and VIsta 32-bit and 64-bit. It]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've been asked what is the difference between Windows XP and VIsta 32-bit and 64-bit. It's a great question. So here's what I was able to dig up...</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946765" target="_blank">Microsoft itself</a>... (more information is <a href="http://windowshelp.microsoft.com/windows/en-us/Help/41531554-d5ef-4f2c-8fb9-149bdc5c8a701033.mspx" target="_blank">available here</a>)</p>
<p>"The main differences between the 32-bit versions of Windows Vista and the 64-bit versions of Windows Vista relate to memory accessibility, memory management, and enhanced security features. The security features that are available in the 64-bit versions of Windows Vista include the following:</p>
<p>•Kernel Patch Protection<br />
•Support for hardware-backed Data Execution Protection (DEP)<br />
•Mandatory driver signing<br />
•Removal of support for 32-bit drivers<br />
•Removal of the 16-bit subsystem</p>
<p>One of the greatest advantages of using a 64-bit version of Windows Vista is the ability to access physical memory (RAM) that is above the 4-gigabyte (GB) range. This physical memory is not addressable by 32-bit versions of Windows Vista.</p>
<p>Depending on the version of Windows Vista that is installed, a 64-bit version of Windows Vista supports from 1 GB of RAM to more than 128 GB of RAM. The ability to address more physical memory lets Windows Vista minimize the time that is required to swap processes in and out of physical memory. Therefore, Windows Vista can manage processes more efficiently. This memory management feature helps improve the overall performance of Windows Vista."</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.webopedia.com/DidYouKnow/Computer_Science/2004/64_bit.asp" target="_blank">Webopedia</a>...</p>
<p><!--[if gte mso 9]&#62;  Normal 0     false false false  EN-CA X-NONE X-NONE              MicrosoftInternetExplorer4              &#60;![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]&#62;                                                                                                                                            &#60;![endif]--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:115%;">-Users would note a performance increase because a 64-bit CPU can handle more memory and larger files</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:115%;">-most benefits of a 64-bit CPU will go unnoticed without the key components of a 64-bit operating system and 64-bit software and drivers which are able to take advantage of 64-bit processor features</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:115%;">-Benefits of 64-bit processors would be seen with more demanding applications such as video encoding, scientific research, searching massive databases; tasks where being able to load massive amounts of data into the system's memory is required.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
